BioMedical Waste Management in an Indian Hospital

BioMedical Waste Management in an Indian hospitalIntroductionThe gasconade produced in the course of wellnesscare activities carries a laster likely for infection and injury than every(prenominal) other type of yearn. Inadequate and inappropriate knowledge of manipulation of healthcare xerox whitethorn have serious health consequences and a signifi brush offt impact on the environment as well.According to Bio-Medical Waste (management and handling) observes, 1998 of India, Bio Medical Waste (BMW) means any solid, fluid, or liquid waste including its containers and any intermediate product which is generated during the diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of human beings or animals or in research activities pertaining there or in the production or testing of biological and includes categories for same(p) 1The large volumes of health care waste if not managed properly can bakshish to a global hazard. This could not just now lead to the spread of highly contagious disea ses but the hazardous chemical waste produced by the use of items can cause considerable damage to the eco constitution and the environment.2 Majority of waste (75-90%) produced by the healthcare providers is non-risk or general and it is estimated that the remaining (10-25%) healthcare waste is regarded as hazardous the potential for creating a variety of health problems.3Infectious waste may contain any of a great variety of pathogenic microorganisms. Pathogens in infectious waste may enter the human body via number of routes through a puncture, abrasion, or cut in the skin through the mucous membranes by ambition by ingestion .4 Bio medical waste collection and proper disposal has become a significant concern for both the medical and general community. Among altogether health problems, there is a particular concern with HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B and C, for which there is a strong evidence of transmission through healthcare waste.5In the healthcare sector alone, the population Heal th Organization estimates that unsafe injections cause approximately 30,000 new HIV infections, 8 million HBV infections, and 1.2 million HCV infections worldwide every year.6The BMW rule applies to all those who generate, collect, receive, store, transport, treat, dispose or handle BMW in any manner and too to every institution that generate BMW.Effective management of biomedical waste is not only a legal necessity but also a social responsibility. Hence, there is a need for resource material to help oneself administrators, doctors, nurses and paramedical staffs. The usance of Bio-Medical Waste are mainly to reduce waste generation, to ensure its efficient collection, handling, as well as safe disposal in such a way that it controls infection and improves safety for employees working in the system. For this, a conscious, coordinated and cooperative effort has to be made from all hospital staff7. India already has biomedical waste management regulations including a ban on the in cineration of biomedical waste with the exception of human and animal waste at the nub level, but their implementation and enforcement throughout the country has been inconsistent.The present cross sectional questionnaire strike was conducted in Ahmedabad city, Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of interns, graduates post graduates at one-on-one dental colleges in Ahmedabad regarding biomedical waste management.Material and MethodAhmedabad is the largest city and former capital of the Gujarat. Ahmedabad is located on the banks of river Sabarmati, 32 km from the state capital Gandhinagar.7 The study savour includes intern, graduates and post graduates from private dental college in Ahmedabad.This study was conducted in private dental colleges in Ahmedabad City, Gujarat, India. A total of 135 dentists were selected, from which interns, graduates and postgraduates were divided equally. The selection of archetypes for the study was carried out by using simple random sampling techni que. To make the sample more representative 45 Dentists from each private dental college were selected randomly. The sample size of 135 was determined. From each group from each college we have taken 15 subjects. Participants who do not want to participate in the study, not responding aft(prenominal) repeated reminders and incompletely filled questionnaires were excluded from the study.The survey was scheduled to spread over a period of 1 month. A detailed calendar weekly schedule was alert well in advance. Although a detailed schedule was prepared meticulously, few adjustments and changes were done due to logistic reasons. Two days in a week were allotted for conducting the study. A questionnaire related to biomedical waste in the form of multiple choices was given to each participant and the response sheets were collated after a week. adept Investigator collected the data. A pilot study was conducted on 20% of the total sample size to check the feasibility of the study and to validate the questionnaire. preliminary to study a questionnaire was pre-tested and validated. The questionnaire was validated for construct and content validity, reliability and ease of use. Content and construct validity shows no significant changes. Questionnaire showed high degree (0.89) of accord during test-retest of questionnaire. Those individuals who participated in the pilot study were not considered for the main study to prevent possible bias.The purpose and procedure of the study was informed to each participant and also participant information sheet was provided to each participant, which explains all aspects of the study. It was explained to them that they had no obligation to complete the questionnaire and could abandon it at any point without stating a reason.After explaining the purpose of the study, the informed consent was obtained from each participant who was willing to participate in the study. Data was collected by using pre-tested self-designed questionnair e. The questionnaire was developed in English only because it was expected that all doctors and nurses were able to comprehend English. The questions were framed in three sets knowledge, lieu and practices of interns, graduates and postgraduates in relation to Bio-medical waste management. Each participant was given a separate copy of the questionnaire personally by investigator and requested to fill it up within seven days. Collected data was coded, compiled and tabulated. The data was analyzed by applying descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Analysis was carried out using SPSS package version 17.ResultThe present study was conducted to access knowledge, attitude and practices of interns, graduates p.g. Students at private dental colleges in Ahmedabad regarding biomedical waste management. A total of 135 participants from private dental colleges of Ahmedabad city were included in the study population. remit 1. illustrates the diffusion of subjects according to their gender. Out of 135 participants 79 (58.5%) were male and 56 (41.5%) were female. We can see the answers given by the participants in table 2 which is self explanatory. confuse 3. illustrates that the majority of the participants were having good knowledge regarding bio medical waste management. Whereas their attitude towards the same was found little low which is an alarming situation (table 4) and they were doing fair practice of the same which is shown in (table 5).Table 1 The distribution of subjects according to their genderTable 2 Answers given by participantsTable 3 shows overall knowledge of subjectsTable 4 shows overall attitude of subjectsTable 5 shows overall practice of subjectsDiscussionThe participants involved in this study were assessed for knowledge, attitude and practice of BMW management. Interestingly, this study revealed that the sensation and proper practice of biomedical waste management was satisfactory which is correlating with the study of Sachan R.. Accor ding to World Health Organization, The humans element is more important than the technology. about any system of treatment and disposal that is operated by well-trained, and well-motivated staff can provide more protection for staff, patients and the community than an expensive or sophisticated system that is managed by staff who do not understand the risks, and the importance of their contribution8 (World Health Organization) For effective management of hospital waste it is essential that personnel hold confident(p) attitude towards care of the environment, occupational health and safety and teamwork. Hospital waste management has major attitudinal and doingsal components9Literature search show poor knowledge, attitude and practices of biomedical waste management among staff and have reported that there is urgent need to train and educate all the staff, in order to play an effective waste management practice. Which is not exactly matching with our studies. A chain is as strong as the weakest link in it, thus the completed staff involved in waste management at some point or the other should be trained properly. Our study shows almost all of the participants were having good knowledge of bio medical waste, which is not in siding with the study of Sudhakar V10.Before providing the training program, it is mandatory to understand the existing gaps and deficiencies in the study participants knowledge, perceptions, and behavior towards hospital waste management. Knowledge, attitude and practices of the personnel play an important role. Lack of these, even with good infrastructure and technology, is of little or no use in proper waste management. Knowing this, the training program can be aimed to make participants understand-environment friendly, healthy and economically viable in-house management systems, to ensure that the waste is carried responsibly from cradle to grave.ConclusionOptimal waste management is at best, a moving target. Usually attenders are res ponsible for spearheading the waste management initiatives. Waste handling is left to lower-level workers who operate without any training, guidance, and supervision. Managing waste requires effective management of people who produce the waste, not just those who handle it. Its primarily the dentists who are responsible for waste generation. But currently, as most of us are aware it is mainly the resistant attitude of dentists that is responsible for poor results on this front. Dentist at the high end of hierarchy should take this issue, which needs to be addressed not as a burden difficult to bear. Proper management of dental hospital waste should be addressed with dignity, by concerted action as duty, and by no uncertain terms as responding to pressure. They probably should not do it because there is legislation, but they need to do it, as they are also socially accountable.ReferencesSharma AK, Bio Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules. Bhopal Suvidha Law House 1998.Aruna. C, Assessment of the knowledge, attitude and Practices regarding biomedical Waste Management amongst the Medical and Paramedical Staff in Tertiary Health Care Centre, Int J Scientific Research, Vol. 2(7) 2012Safe Management of waste from health care activities. WHO, Geneva 1999.4. Prss A, Giroult E, Rushbrook P, Safe management of wastes from healthcare activities, Edited by 1999, WHO5. Central Pollution Control Board. Environmental standard and guidelines for management of Hospital waste. CPCB, Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi, 1996.6. Analysis of Priority Waste Streams Healthcare Waste. Final Information DocumentCommission of the European Communities (CEC), 19937. Khan KDL (4 June 2011), The Symbol of Ahmedabad. Navhind Times, retrived 24 Sept, 2013.8. World Health Organization. Suggested guiding principles and practices for sound management of hazardous hospital waste. New Delhi Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health Organization 2000. p. 3-5.9.Rasheed S, Iqbal S, Baig LA, Mufti K. Hospital waste management in the teaching hospitals of Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc 200555192-5.10. Saini S, Nagarajan SS, Sharma RK. Knowledge, Attitude and practices of bio-medical waste management amongst staff of a tertiary level Hospital in India. J Acad Hosp 20051754-9